View:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
__________________________________
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________.
Commission file number 1-8729
UNISYS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 38-0387840
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)
Unisys Way
Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19424
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (215) 986-4011
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
Shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES [ ] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"
and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer [X] Accelerated Filer [ ]
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ] Smaller Reporting Company [ ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [ ] NO [X]
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of June 30, 2009
370,338,334.
2
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
UNISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Millions)
June 30, December 31,
2009 2008
----------- ------------
Assets
- ------
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents $ 475.0 $ 544.0
Accounts and notes receivable, net 739.9 818.5
Inventories:
Parts and finished equipment 67.4 64.7
Work in process and materials 54.6 70.7
Deferred income taxes 16.8 23.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 132.0 116.7
-------- --------
Total 1,485.7 1,638.4
-------- --------
Properties 1,402.1 1,416.0
Less-Accumulated depreciation and
amortization 1,149.6 1,139.5
-------- --------
Properties, net 252.5 276.5
-------- --------
Outsourcing assets, net 308.2 314.9
Marketable software, net 181.8 202.0
Prepaid postretirement assets 40.5 20.7
Deferred income taxes 90.8 87.6
Goodwill 195.5 189.4
Other long-term assets 171.1 94.6
-------- --------
Total $2,726.1 $2,824.1
======== ========
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit
- -------------------------------------
Current liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt $ 96.0 $ 1.5
Accounts payable 310.6 379.2
Other accrued liabilities 945.4 1,045.7
-------- --------
Total 1,352.0 1,426.4
-------- --------
Long-term debt 965.2 1,059.1
Long-term postretirement liabilities 1,451.1 1,497.0
Other long-term liabilities 302.2 265.4
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' deficit
Common stock, shares issued:
2009; 372.7, 2008; 372.1 3.7 3.7
Accumulated deficit (2,582.3) (2,596.0)
Treasury stock, shares at cost:
2009; 2.4, 2008; 2.2 (44.9) (44.8)
Paid-in capital 4,104.4 4,099.3
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (2,852.2) (2,904.6)
Noncontrolling interests 26.9 18.6
-------- --------
Total stockholders' deficit (1,344.4) (1,423.8)
-------- --------
Total $2,726.1 $2,824.1
======== ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
UNISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(Millions, except per share data)
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
---------------- ---------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
Revenue
Services $1,030.0 $1,197.0 $2,013.8 $2,334.1
Technology 98.7 143.0 214.8 307.2
-------- -------- -------- --------
1,128.7 1,340.0 2,228.6 2,641.3
Costs and expenses
Cost of revenue:
Services 804.5 954.4 1,609.6 1,876.6
Technology 54.5 81.8 126.3 167.7
-------- -------- -------- --------
859.0 1,036.2 1,735.9 2,044.3
Selling, general and administrative 169.2 251.0 342.8 483.5
Research and development 25.1 30.2 52.5 62.9
-------- -------- -------- --------
1,053.3 1,317.4 2,131.2 2,590.7
-------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income 75.4 22.6 97.4 50.6
Interest expense 21.2 21.2 43.0 42.8
Other income (expense), net 3.0 (6.4) (3.7) (7.5)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes 57.2 (5.0) 50.7 .3
Provision for income taxes 16.6 3.5 32.2 27.4
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated net income (loss) 40.6 (8.5) 18.5 (27.1)
Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests (2.5) (5.5) (4.8) (10.3)
-------- ------- ------- --------
Net income (loss) attributable
to Unisys Corporation $ 38.1 $ (14.0) $ 13.7 $ (37.4)
======== ======== ======= ========
Earnings (loss) per share
attributable to Unisys Corporation
Basic $ .10 $ (.04) $ .04 $ (.10)
======== ======== ======= ========
Diluted $ .10 $ (.04) $ .04 $ (.10)
======== ======== ======= ========
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
UNISYS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Millions)
Six Months Ended
June 30
------------------
2009 2008
-------- -------
Cash flows from operating activities
Consolidated net income (loss) $ 18.5 $ (27.1)
Add (deduct) items to reconcile consolidated
net income (loss) to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Employee stock compensation 3.8 11.9
Company stock issued for U.S. 401(k) plan - 23.9
Depreciation and amortization of properties 48.4 53.7
Depreciation and amortization of outsourcing assets 75.7 83.9
Amortization of marketable software 49.7 60.9
Disposal of capital assets 5.6 5.6
Decrease in deferred income taxes, net 3.9 -
Decrease in receivables, net 101.7 89.4
Decrease in inventories 15.8 9.8
Decrease in accounts payable and other
accrued liabilities (206.2) (207.2)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 21.8 (26.9)
Increase in other assets (52.0) (80.8)
Other 1.0 5.2
------- ------
Net cash provided by operating activities 87.7 2.3
------- ------
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from investments 200.9 3,276.9
Purchases of investments (199.6) (3,306.5)
Collateralized letters of credit (72.3) -
Investment in marketable software (29.5) (45.4)
Capital additions of properties (18.1) (32.1)
Capital additions of outsourcing assets (53.2) (58.6)
Purchases of businesses (1.5) (1.8)
------- ------
Net cash used for investing activities (173.3) (167.5)
------- ------
Cash flows from financing activities
Payment of long-term debt - (200.0)
Financing fees (.7) (.8)
------- ------
Net cash used for financing activities (.7) (200.8)
------- ------
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash and cash equivalents 17.3 7.2
------- ------
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (69.0) (358.8)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 544.0 830.2
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 475.0 $ 471.4
======== =======
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Unisys Corporation
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
In the opinion of management, the financial information furnished herein
reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods
specified. These adjustments consist only of normal recurring accruals except
as disclosed herein. Because of seasonal and other factors, results for interim
periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions about future events. These estimates and assumptions affect the
amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets
and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Such
estimates include the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories, outsourcing
assets, marketable software, goodwill and other long-lived assets, legal
contingencies, indemnifications, and assumptions used in the calculation of
income taxes and retirement and other post-employment benefits, among others.
These estimates and assumptions are based on management's best estimates and
judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing
basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current
economic environment, which management believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Management adjusts such estimates and assumptions when facts and
circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets, volatile equity and foreign
currency markets and reductions in information technology spending have combined
to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As
future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual
results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those
estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be
reflected in the financial statements in future periods.
The company's accounting policies are set forth in detail in note 1 of the notes
to the consolidated financial statements in the company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such Annual Report also contains a discussion of the company's
critical accounting policies. The company believes that these critical
accounting policies affect its more significant estimates and judgments used in
the preparation of the company's consolidated financial statements. There have
been no changes in the company's critical accounting policies from those
disclosed in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
a. The following table shows how earnings (loss) per share attributable to
Unisys Corporation was computed for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 (dollars in millions, shares in thousands):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------- -------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss) attributable
to Unisys Corporation $ 38.1 $ (14.0) $ 13.7 $ (37.4)
======== ========= ======== ========
Weighted average shares 370,320 358,167 370,183 356,482
======== ========= ======== ========
Basic earnings (loss) per share $ .10 $ (.04) $ .04 $ (.10)
======== ========= ======== ========
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Net income (loss) attributable
to Unisys Corporation $ 38.1 $ (14.0) $ 13.7 $ (37.4)
======== ========= ======== ========
Weighted average shares 370,320 358,167 370,183 356,482
Plus incremental shares
from assumed conversions
of employee stock plans 4,175 - 2,594 -
-------- --------- -------- --------
Adjusted weighted average shares 374,495 358,167 372,777 356,482
======== ========= ======== ========
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ .10 $ (.04) $ .04 $ (.10)
======== ========= ======== ========
6
At June 30, 2009 and 2008, 29.8 million and 34.3 million, respectively, of
employee stock options were antidilutive and therefore excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share.
b. A breakdown of the individual components of the company's cost-reduction
charges follows (in millions of dollars):
Work-Force
Reductions
-------------- Idle
Headcount Total U.S. Int'l. Lease Cost
--------- ----- ---- ------ ----------
Balance at December
31, 2008 787 $ 95.8 $ 25.1 $ 27.2 $ 43.5
Utilized (714) (48.1) (17.9) (19.4) (10.8)
Changes in estimates
and revisions (32) (9.4) .1 (2.7) (6.8)
Translation adjustments - 1.6 - (.6) 2.2
------ ------ ----- ----- ------
Balance at June 30, 2009 41 $ 39.9 $ 7.3 $ 4.5 $ 28.1
====== ====== ===== ===== ======
Expected future utilization:
2009 remaining six months 41 $ 16.8 $ 7.3 $ 4.5 $ 5.0
Beyond 2009 23.1 - - 23.1
Due to changes in estimates related to cost-reduction charges, $7.0 million of
income was recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $2.5
million recorded as expense in the year-ago period, and $9.4 million was
recorded as income in the current six-month period compared with $.8 million
recorded as income in the year-ago six-month period.
c. Net periodic pension expense (income) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 is presented below (in millions of dollars):
Three Months Three Months
Ended June 30, 2009 Ended June 30, 2008
---------------------- ----------------------
U.S. Int'l. U.S. Int'l.
Total Plans Plans Total Plans Plans
----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----
Service cost $ 2.7 $ - $ 2.7 $ 7.9 $ - $ 7.9
Interest cost 98.1 70.3 27.8 106.0 71.1 34.9
Expected return on
plan assets (127.3) (95.9) (31.4) (142.6) (101.6) (41.0)
Amortization of prior
service cost .3 .2 .1 .2 .2 -
Recognized net actuarial loss 17.3 16.2 1.1 18.2 14.9 3.3
Curtailment loss - - - 1.5 - 1.5
----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----
Net periodic pension
expense (income) $ (8.9) $ (9.2) $ .3 $ (8.8) $ (15.4) $ 6.6
====== ====== ===== ====== ======= =====
Six Months Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009 Ended June 30, 2008
------------------- ----------------------
U.S. Int'l. U.S. Int'l.
Total Plans Plans Total Plans Plans
----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ------
Service cost $ 5.6 $ - $ 5.6 $ 16.2 $ - $16.2
Interest cost 196.4 142.5 53.9 210.9 141.9 69.0
Expected return on
plan assets (253.6) (192.4) (61.2) (285.3) (203.7) (81.6)
Amortization of prior
service cost .5 .4 .1 .5 .4 .1
Recognized net actuarial loss 39.3 37.1 2.2 35.9 28.7 7.2
Curtailment loss - - - 1.5 - 1.5
------- ------- ----- ------- ----- ----
Net periodic pension
expense (income) $ (11.8) $(12.4) $ .6 $(20.3) $(32.7) $12.4
======= ======= ===== ====== ====== =====
The company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $100-
$105 million to its worldwide defined benefit pension plans in 2009 compared
with $78.1 million in 2008. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
$30.9 million and $38.5 million, respectively, of cash contributions have been
made. In accordance with regulations governing contributions to U.S. defined
7
benefit pension plans, the company is not required to fund its U.S. qualified
defined benefit pension plan in 2009.
The expense related to the company's match to the U.S. 401(k) plan for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero and $26.7 million,
respectively. Effective January 1, 2009, the company match was suspended.
Net periodic postretirement benefit expense for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 is presented below (in millions of dollars):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------- -------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
Service cost $ .1 $ .1 $ .2 $ .4
Interest cost 2.9 3.1 5.9 6.5
Expected return on assets (.1) (.1) (.2) (.2)
Amortization of prior
service cost .4 .3 .7 1.2
Recognized net actuarial
loss .8 1.1 1.7 2.2
---- ---- ---- -----
Net periodic postretirement
benefit expense $4.1 $4.5 $ 8.3 $10.1
==== ==== ===== =====
The company expects to make cash contributions of approximately $23 million to
its postretirement benefit plan in 2009 compared with $19.5 million in 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, $10.0 million and $10.2
million, respectively, of cash contributions have been made.
d. Due to its foreign operations, the company is exposed to the effects of
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on the U.S. dollar, principally
related to intercompany account balances. The company uses derivative financial
instruments to manage its exposure to market risks from changes in foreign
currency exchange rates on such balances. The company enters into foreign
exchange forward contracts, generally having maturities of one month, which have
not been designated as hedging instruments. At June 30, 2009, the fair value of
such contracts was a net gain of $.5 million, of which $4.0 million has been
recognized in "Prepaid expenses and other current assets" and $3.5 million has
been recognized in "Other accrued liabilities". Changes in the fair value of
these instruments was a gain of $.9 million and $.3 million for the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, which has been recognized in
earnings in "Other income (expense), net" in the company's consolidated
statement of income.
e. Under stockholder approved stock-based plans, stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units may be granted
to officers, directors and other key employees. At June 30, 2009, 14.7 million
shares of unissued common stock of the company were available for granting under
these plans.
The fair value of stock option awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions and weighted-average fair
values:
Six Months Ended June 30,
--------------------------
2009 2008
---- ----
Weighted-average fair value of grant $.28 $1.64
Risk-free interest rate 1.57% 3.63%
Expected volatility 58.28% 45.28%
Expected life of options in years 3.77 3.67
Expected dividend yield - -
Restricted stock unit awards may contain time-based units, performance-based
units or a combination of both. Each performance-based unit will vest into zero
to 1.5 shares depending on the degree to which the performance goals are met.
Compensation expense resulting from these awards is recognized as expense
ratably for each installment from the date of grant until the date the
restrictions lapse and is based on the fair market value at the date of grant
and the probability of achievement of the specific performance-related goals.
8
The company records all share-based expense in selling, general and
administrative expense.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the company recorded $3.8
million and $11.9 million of share-based compensation expense, respectively,
which is comprised of $2.6 million and $11.6 million of restricted stock unit
expense and $1.2 million and $.3 million of stock option expense, respectively.
A summary of stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009
follows (shares in thousands):
Weighted-
Weighted- Average Aggregate
Average Remaining Intrinsic
Exercise Contractual Value
Options Shares Price Term (years) ($ in millions)
------- ------ --------- ------------ ---------------
Outstanding at
December
31, 2008 34,141 $16.35
Granted 11,552 .64
Forfeited and
expired (4,663) 24.34
------
Outstanding at
June 30, 2009 41,030 11.08 2.71 $9.5
======
Vested and
expected to
vest at
June 30, 2009 39,870 11.37 2.66 8.6
======
Exercisable at
June 30, 2009 28,306 15.69 1.87 -
======
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pretax value of the
difference between the company's closing stock price on the last trading day of
the period and the exercise price of the options, multiplied by the number of
in-the-money stock options that would have been received by the option holders
had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2009. The intrinsic
value of the company's stock options changes based on the closing price of the
company's stock. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was zero
since no options were exercised. As of June 30, 2009, $3.1 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.5 years.
A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended June 30,
2009 follows (shares in thousands):
Weighted-
Restricted Average
Stock Grant Date
Units Fair Value
---------- ----------
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 7,630 $5.07
Granted 1,657 .64
Vested (522) 5.25
Forfeited and expired (2,808) 4.48
-----
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 5,957 4.09
=====
The fair value of restricted stock units is determined based on the trading
price of the company's common shares on the date of grant. The weighted-average
grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $.64 and $4.12, respectively. As of June 30,
2009, there was $6.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
outstanding restricted stock units granted under the company's plans. That cost
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years. The
total fair value of restricted share units vested during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $.4 million and $.8 million, respectively.
Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options or upon lapse of restrictions
on restricted stock units is newly issued shares. Cash received from the
exercise of stock options for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
9
zero. In light of its tax position, the company is currently not recognizing
any tax benefits from the exercise of stock options or upon issuance of stock
upon lapse of restrictions on restricted stock units. Tax benefits resulting
from tax deductions in excess of the compensation costs recognized are
classified as financing cash flows.
f. The company has two business segments: Services and Technology. Revenue
classifications by segment are as follows: Services - systems integration and
consulting, outsourcing, infrastructure services and core maintenance;
Technology - enterprise-class servers and specialized technologies.
The accounting policies of each business segment are the same as those followed
by the company as a whole. Intersegment sales and transfers are priced as if
the sales or transfers were to third parties. Accordingly, the Technology
segment recognizes intersegment revenue and manufacturing profit on hardware and
software shipments to customers under Services contracts. The Services segment,
in turn, recognizes customer revenue and marketing profits on such shipments of
company hardware and software to customers. The Services segment also includes
the sale of hardware and software products sourced from third parties that are
sold to customers through the company's Services channels. In the company's
consolidated statements of income, the manufacturing costs of products sourced
from the Technology segment and sold to Services customers are reported in cost
of revenue for Services.
Also included in the Technology segment's sales and operating profit are sales
of hardware and software sold to the Services segment for internal use in
Services engagements. The amount of such profit included in operating income of
the Technology segment for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$9.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The amount for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $10.6 million and $11.2 million, respectively.
The profit on these transactions is eliminated in Corporate.
The company evaluates business segment performance on operating income exclusive
of restructuring charges and unusual and nonrecurring items, which are included
in Corporate. All other corporate and centrally incurred costs are allocated to
the business segments based principally on revenue, employees, square footage or
usage.
A summary of the company's operations by business segment for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is presented below (in millions of
dollars):
Total Corporate Services Technology
----- --------- -------- ----------
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
------------------
Customer revenue $1,128.7 $1,030.0 $ 98.7
Intersegment $ (47.3) 1.6 45.7
-------- -------- -------- -------
Total revenue $1,128.7 $ (47.3) $1,031.6 $ 144.4
======== ======== ======== =======
Operating income (loss) $ 75.4 $ 1.4 $ 81.9 $ (7.9)
======== ======== ======== =======
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
------------------
Customer revenue $1,340.0 $1,197.0 $ 143.0
Intersegment - $ (51.0) 2.7 48.3
-------- -------- -------- -------
Total revenue $1,340.0 $ (51.0) $1,199.7 $ 191.3
======== ======== ======== =======
Operating income (loss) $ 22.6 $ (9.6) $ 39.2 $ (7.0)
======== ======== ======== =======
10
Total Corporate Services Technology
----- --------- -------- ----------
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
------------------
Customer revenue $2,228.6 $2,013.8 $ 214.8
Intersegment $ (85.2) 3.3 81.9
-------- -------- -------- -------
Total revenue $2,228.6 $ (85.2) $2,017.1 $ 296.7
======== ======== ======== =======
Operating income (loss) $ 97.4 $ 14.9 $ 108.1 $ (25.6)
======== ======== ======== =======
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
----------------
Customer revenue $2,641.3 $2,334.1 $ 307.2
Intersegment - $ (94.7) 5.4 89.3
-------- ------- -------- -------
Total revenue $2,641.3 $ (94.7) $2,339.5 $ 396.5
======== ======= ======== =======
Operating income (loss) $ 50.6 $ (9.9) $ 65.9 $ (5.4)
======== ======= ======== =======
Presented below is a reconciliation of total business segment operating income
(loss) to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes (in millions of
dollars):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------- -------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
Total segment operating
income $ 74.0 $ 32.2 $ 82.5 $ 60.5
Interest expense (21.2) (21.2) (43.0) (42.8)
Other income (expense), net 3.0 (6.4) (3.7) (7.5)
Corporate and eliminations 1.4 (9.6) 14.9 (9.9)
------- ------- ------- -------
Total income (loss)
before income taxes $ 57.2 $ (5.0) $ 50.7 $ .3
======= ======= ======= =======
Customer revenue by classes of similar products or services, by segment, is
presented below (in millions of dollars):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------- -------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
Services
Systems integration
and consulting $ 351.7 $ 389.4 $ 691.2 $ 733.5
Outsourcing 457.9 520.2 883.3 1,014.7
Infrastructure services 143.8 191.9 286.0 393.6
Core maintenance 76.6 95.5 153.3 192.3
-------- -------- -------- --------
1,030.0 1,197.0 2,013.8 2,334.1
Technology
Enterprise-class servers 77.1 114.6 156.7 243.4
Specialized technologies 21.6 28.4 58.1 63.8
-------- -------- -------- --------
98.7 143.0 214.8 307.2
-------- -------- -------- --------
Total $1,128.7 $1,340.0 $2,228.6 $2,641.3
======== ======== ======== ========
11
Geographic information about the company's revenue, which is principally based
on location of the selling organization, is presented below (in millions of
dollars):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------- -------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
United States $ 542.1 $ 571.8 $1,080.6 $1,108.7
United Kingdom 136.3 200.1 266.4 409.6
Other international 450.3 568.1 881.6 1,123.0
------- -------- ------- --------
Total $1,128.7 $1,340.0 $2,228.6 $2,641.3
======== ======== ======== ========
g. Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 includes the following components (in millions of dollars):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------------- -----------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ------- ------ -------
Consolidated net income (loss) $ 40.6 $ (8.5) $ 18.5 $ (27.1)
------- ------ ------ -------
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cash flow hedges
Loss - (.1) - (.6)
Reclassification adjustments - .2 - .5
Foreign currency translation adjustments 59.5 14.0 45.7 (.3)
Postretirement adjustments (21.7) 19.4 10.2 25.4
------- ------- ----- ------
Total other comprehensive income 37.8 33.5 55.9 25.0
------- ------- ----- ------
Consolidated comprehensive income (loss) 78.4 25.0 74.4 (2.1)
Comprehensive income attributable to
noncontrolling interests 6.6 5.1 8.3 9.5
------- ------ ----- -------
Comprehensive income attributable
to Unisys Corporation $ 85.0 $ 30.1 $ 82.7 $ 7.4
======= ======= ====== =======
Accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009
is as follows (in millions of dollars):
Post-
Translation retirement
Total Adjustments Plans
----- ----------- --------
Balance at December 31, 2008 $(2,904.6) $(701.5) $(2,203.1)
Change during period 52.4 40.3 12.1
-------- ------- ---------
Balance at June 30, 2009 $(2,852.2) $(661.2) $(2,191.0)
======== ======= =========
Noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 is as follows
(in millions of dollars):
Non-
Controlling
Interests
-----------
Balance at December 31, 2008 $ 18.6
Net income 4.8
Translation adjustments 5.4
Postretirement plans (1.9)
------
Balance at June 30, 2009 $ 26.9
======
h. For equipment manufactured by the company, the company warrants that it will
substantially conform to relevant published specifications for 12 months after
shipment to the customer. The company will repair or replace, at its option and
expense, items of equipment that do not meet this warranty. For company
software, the company warrants that it will conform substantially to then-
12
current published functional specifications for 90 days from customer's receipt.
The company will provide a workaround or correction for material errors in its
software that prevents its use in a production environment.
The company estimates the costs that may be incurred under its warranties and
records a liability in the amount of such costs at the time revenue is
recognized. Factors that affect the company's warranty liability include the
number of units sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims and
cost per claim. The company assesses quarterly the adequacy of its recorded
warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.
Presented below is a reconciliation of the aggregate product warranty
liability (in millions of dollars):
Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
------------- -------------
2009 2008 2009 2008
---- ---- ---- ----
Balance at beginning of period $ 4.5 $ 5.8 $ 5.2 $ 6.9
Accruals for warranties
issued during the period .6 .7 1.1 1.4
Settlements made during
the period (.7) (.7) (1.4) (1.4)
Changes in liability for
pre-existing warranties
during the period,
including expirations .2 (.7) (.3) (1.8)
------- ------- ------- ------
Balance at June 30 $ 4.6 $ 5.1 $ 4.6 $ 5.1
======= ======= ======= ======
i. Cash paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 for income tax
was $40.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively.
Cash paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 for interest was
$46.1 million and $38.2 million, respectively.
j. Effective January 1, 2009, the company adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" (SFAS No.
141R). SFAS No. 141R replaced SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations," and
established principles and requirements for how the acquirer: (a) recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (b)
recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a
gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines what information to disclose to
enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009.
Effective January 1, 2009, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements - an amendment to ARB No. 51" (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 describes
a noncontrolling interest, sometimes called a minority interest, as the portion
of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent.
SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require, among
other items: (a) the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other
than the parent be clearly identified, labeled, and presented in the
consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from
the parent's equity; (b) the amount of consolidated net income (loss)
attributable to the parent and the noncontrolling interests be clearly
identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income;
and (c) entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and
distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the
noncontrolling owners. As required by SFAS No. 160, the presentation and
disclosure requirements have been applied retrospectively for all periods
presented. See note (m).
Effective January 1, 2009, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about (a)
how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative
13
instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and
its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related
hedged items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance and
cash flows. See note (d).
Effective June 30, 2009, the company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 165, "Subsequent Events" (SFAS No. 165). SFAS No. 165 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after
the balance sheet date but before the date the financial statements are issued
or available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 requires companies to reflect in their
financial statements the effects of subsequent events that provide additional
evidence about conditions at the balance-sheet date. Subsequent events that
provide evidence about conditions that arose after the balance-sheet date should
be disclosed if the financial statements would otherwise be misleading.
Disclosures should include the nature of the event and either an estimate of its
financial effect or a statement that an estimate cannot be made. See note (o).
Effective June 30, 2009, the company adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and Accounting
Principles Board (APB) 28-1 "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments". The FSP amends SFAS No. 107 "Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments" to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments in interim financial statements. See note (p).
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1 "Employers' Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets." This FSP provides guidance on an
employer's disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other
postretirement plan. Specifically, employers will be required to disclose
information about how investment allocation decisions are made, the fair value
of each major category of plan assets and information about the inputs and
valuation techniques used to develop the fair value measurements of plan assets.
The disclosures about plan assets required by FSP FAS 132(R)-1 shall be provided
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, which is December 31, 2009 for
the company.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
166, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140" (SFAS No. 166). Among other changes, SFAS No. 166 eliminates
the concept of a "qualifying special-purpose entity," changes the requirements
for derecognizing financial assets, defines the term participating interest to
establish specific conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a
financial asset as a sale and requires additional disclosures. SFAS No. 166 is
effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity's first annual reporting
period that begins after November 15, 2009 (which for the company is January 1,
2010), for interim periods within the first annual reporting period and for
interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is
prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of SFAS No. 166 are
effective for transfers occurring on or after the effective date. Based on an
initial review, the company believes that its current U.S. trade accounts
receivable facility will no longer meet the requirements to be treated as a sale
of receivables, and that it will be accounted for as a secured borrowing with
pledge of collateral.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
167, "Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)" (SFAS No. 167). SFAS No. 167
changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently
capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate
an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design and a
company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly
impact the entity's economic performance. SFAS No. 167 is effective as of the
beginning of a reporting entity's first annual reporting period that begins
after November 15, 2009 (which for the company is January 1, 2010), for interim
periods within the first annual reporting period and for interim and annual
reporting periods thereafter. Earlier application is prohibited. The company
is currently assessing the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on its
consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
168, "The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162" (the
Codification), which will be effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The
Codification is not expected to change U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles but combines all nongovernmental authoritative standards into a
comprehensive, topically organized online database. All other accounting
literature excluded from the Codification will be considered nonauthoritative.
The company will adopt the use of the Codification for the quarter ending
September 30, 2009. The company is currently evaluating the effect on its
14
financial statement disclosures since all future references to authoritative
accounting literature will be references in accordance with the Codification.
k. There are various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings that have
been brought or asserted against the company, which arise in the ordinary course
of business, including actions with respect to commercial and government
contracts, labor and employment, employee benefits, environmental matters and
intellectual property. The company records a provision for these matters when it
is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss
can be reasonably estimated. Any provisions are reviewed at least quarterly and
are adjusted to reflect the impact and status of settlements, rulings, advice of
counsel and other information and events pertinent to a particular matter.
The company believes that it has valid defenses with respect to legal matters
pending against it. Based on its experience, the company also believes that the
damage amounts claimed in the lawsuits disclosed below are not a meaningful
indicator of the company's potential liability. Litigation is inherently
unpredictable, however, and it is possible that the company's results of
operations or cash flow could be affected in any particular period by the
resolution of one or more of the legal matters pending against it.
In 2002, the company and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
entered into a competitively awarded contract providing for the establishment of
secure information technology environments in airports. The Civil Division of
the Department of Justice, working with the Inspector General's Office of the
Department of Homeland Security, is reviewing issues relating to labor
categorization and overtime on the TSA contract. The Civil Division is also
reviewing issues relating to cyber intrusion protection under the TSA and
follow-on contracts. The company is working cooperatively with the Civil
Division. The company does not know whether the Civil Division will pursue
these matters, or, if pursued, what effect they might have on the company.
The company has contracts with the General Services Administration (GSA), known
as Multiple Award Schedule Contracts, under which various U.S. governmental
agencies can purchase products and services from the company. Auditors from the
GSA's Office of Inspector General are reviewing the company's compliance with
the disclosure and pricing provisions under two of these contracts, and whether
the company has potentially overcharged the government under the contracts.
Separately, the company has made voluntary disclosures about these matters to
the responsible GSA contracting officers. The company is providing pricing and
other information to the GSA auditors and is working cooperatively with them.
As the audit is on-going, the company cannot predict the outcome at this time.
In April 2007, the Ministry of Justice of Belgium sued Unisys Belgium SA-NV, a
Unisys subsidiary (Unisys Belgium), in the Court of First Instance of
Brussels. The Belgian government had engaged the company to design and develop
software for a computerized system to be used to manage the Belgian court
system. The Belgian State terminated the contract and in its lawsuit has alleged
that the termination was justified because Unisys Belgium failed to deliver
satisfactory software in a timely manner. It claims damages of approximately 28
million euros. The company believes it has valid defenses to the claims and
contends that the Belgian State's termination of the contract was unjustified.
Unisys Belgium has filed its defense and counterclaim in the amount of
approximately 18.5 million euros. The litigation is proceeding.
In December 2007, Lufthansa AG sued Unisys Deutschland GmbH, a Unisys subsidiary
(Unisys Germany), in the District Court of Frankfurt, Germany, for allegedly
failing to perform properly its obligations during the initial phase of a 2004
software design and development contract relating to a Lufthansa customer
loyalty program. Under the contract, either party was free to withdraw from the
project at the conclusion of the initial design phase. Rather than withdraw,
Lufthansa instead terminated the contract and failed to pay the balance owed to
Unisys Germany for the initial phase. Lufthansa's lawsuit alleges that Unisys
Germany breached the contract by failing to deliver a proper design for the new
system and seeks approximately 21.4 million euros in damages. The company
believes it has valid defenses and has filed its defense and a counterclaim in
the amount of approximately 1.5 million euros. The litigation is proceeding.
In July 2008, Lufthansa Systems Passenger Services GmbH sued Unisys Germany in
the District Court of Frankfurt, Germany, in connection with a 2005 agreement
under which Unisys Germany was to develop passenger management software for
Lufthansa Systems. Lufthansa Systems purported to terminate the agreement for
cause in July 2007 claiming that Unisys Germany failed to deliver satisfactory
software in a timely manner. The lawsuit seeks a monetary recovery of
approximately 49 million euros. The company believes it has valid defenses and
15
has filed its defense and a counterclaim in the amount of approximately 8.6
million euros. The litigation is proceeding.
Notwithstanding that the ultimate results of the lawsuits, claims,
investigations and proceedings that have been brought or asserted against the
company are not currently determinable, the company believes that at June 30,
2009, it has adequate provisions for any such matters.
l. Accounting rules governing income taxes require that deferred tax assets and
liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary
differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities.
In addition, these rules also require that deferred tax assets be reduced by a
valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or the
entire deferred tax asset will not be realized.
The company evaluates quarterly the realizability of its deferred tax assets by
assessing its valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance,
if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are the
company's forecast of future taxable income and available tax-planning
strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.
The company uses tax-planning strategies to realize or renew net deferred tax
assets to avoid the potential loss of future tax benefits.
In 2005, based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections of
future taxable income over the periods during which the deferred tax assets are
deductible, management concluded that it is more likely than not that the U.S.
and certain foreign deferred tax assets in excess of deferred tax liabilities
would not be realized. A full valuation allowance was recognized in 2005 and is
currently maintained for all U.S. and certain foreign deferred tax assets in
excess of deferred tax liabilities. The company will record a tax provision or
benefit for those international subsidiaries that do not have a full valuation
allowance against their deferred tax assets. Any profit or loss recorded for
the company's U.S. operations will have no provision or benefit associated with
it. As a result, the company's provision or benefit for taxes will vary
significantly depending on the geographic distribution of income.
m. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified due to the adoption of
SFAS No. 160, see note (j). As a result of the adoption, the following
retroactive adjustment was made: the December 31, 2008 noncontrolling
interests' balance of $30.5 million, previously presented in other long-term
liabilities, has been presented as part of stockholders' deficit. Also, in
connection with the adoption, the December 31, 2008 noncontrolling interests
portion of the postretirement plans of $11.9 million, which had previously been
included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, has been reported as a
reduction in the noncontrolling interests included in stockholders' deficit.
n. On July 31, 2009, the company completed offers to exchange its 6 7/8% senior
notes due 2010 (the 2010 Notes), its 8% senior notes due 2012 (the 2012 Notes),
its 8 1/2% senior notes due 2015 (the 2015 Notes) and its 12 1/2% senior notes
due 2016 (the 2016 Notes) in private placements for new 12 3/4% senior secured
notes due 2014 (the First Lien Notes), new 14 1/4% senior secured notes due 2015
(the Second Lien Notes and, together with First Lien Notes, the New Secured
Notes), shares of the company's common stock and cash. On that date, the
company issued approximately $385.0 million aggregate principal amount of First
Lien Notes, approximately $246.6 million aggregate principal amount of Second
Lien Notes and approximately 52.4 million shares of common stock and paid $30.0
million in cash in exchange for approximately $235.1 million aggregate principal
amount of 2010 Notes, approximately $331.9 million aggregate principal amount of
2012 Notes, approximately $134.0 million aggregate principal amount of 2015
Notes, and approximately $59.4 million aggregate principal amount of 2016 Notes.
The New Secured Notes are guaranteed by Unisys Holding Corporation, a wholly-
owned Delaware corporation that directly or indirectly holds the shares of
substantially all of the company's foreign subsidiaries, and by certain of the
company's other current and future U.S. subsidiaries. The First Lien Notes and
Second Lien Notes are secured by first-priority liens and second priority liens,
respectively, (in each case, subject to permitted prior liens) by substantially
all of the company's assets, except (i) accounts receivable that are subject to
one or more receivables facilities, (ii) real estate located outside the U.S.,
(iii) cash or cash equivalents securing reimbursement obligations under letters
of credit or surety bonds and (iv) certain other excluded assets. As a result of
the exchange, the company's current maturities of long-term debt at June 30,
2009 were reduced to $96.0 million, principally consisting of $64.9 million of
6 7/8% of notes due March 2010 not tendered plus $30.0 million of cash
consideration paid at closing to the holders of the 2010 notes tendered.
Following completion of the exchange, the company's net long-term debt was
reduced by $128.8 million. The company is currently evaluating the accounting
16
treatment of the exchange offer and will record any gain or loss in the quarter
ending September 30, 2009.
o. The company has evaluated subsequent events (events occurring after June 30,
2009) for recognition or disclosure in these financial statements up to
July 31, 2009.
p. Financial assets with carrying values approximating fair value include cash
and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Financial liabilities with
carrying values approximating fair value include accounts payable and other
accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of these financial assets and
liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities. At June 30,
2009, the carrying amount of long-term debt, which included current maturities
of long-term debt, exceeded fair value, which is based on market prices, of
such debt by approximately $356 million.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Despite a decline in revenue, the company reported significantly improved
profitability and cash flow for the first six months of 2009 as its results
benefited from ongoing actions to concentrate its resources more effectively
and reduce its cost base.
Revenue in the first half of 2009 compared with the year-ago period was
impacted by weakness in global economic conditions as well as negative foreign
currency translation. The company reported first-half 2009 revenue of $2.23
billion, down 16% compared with first-half 2008 revenue of $2.64 billion.
Foreign currency exchange rates had an approximately 9 percentage-point
negative impact on revenue in the first half of 2009. On a constant currency
basis, revenue declined 7% in the first six months of 2009 compared to the
prior-year period.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, operating income increased to $97.4
million compared with $50.6 million in the first six months of 2008. Operating
profit percent increased to 4.4% for the first six months of 2009 compared with
1.9% in the year-ago period. After a tax provision of $32.2 million, the
company reported net income attributable to Unisys Corporation of $13.7
million, or $.04 per share, for the first six months of 2009. This compared
with a year-ago net loss attributable to Unisys Corporation of $37.4 million,
or $.10 per share, which included a tax provision of $27.4 million.
Cash from operating activities increased to $87.7 million in the first half of
2009 compared with $2.3 million in the same period of 2008.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPANY RESULTS
Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $1.13 billion compared with
$1.34 billion for the second quarter of 2008, a decrease of 16% from the prior
year. Foreign currency fluctuations had an 8-percentage-point negative impact
on revenue in the second quarter compared with the year-ago period. Services
revenue declined 14% and Technology revenue declined 31% in the second quarter
compared with the year-ago period. U.S. revenue was down 5% in the second
quarter compared with the year-ago period, principally driven by declines in
commercial revenue which were partially offset by increases in Federal
government revenue. International revenue decreased 24% in the three months
ended June 30, 2009 due to declines in all major regions. On a constant
currency basis, international revenue declined 10% in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Total gross profit margin was 23.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared with 22.7% in the three months ended June 30, 2008. The increase in
gross profit margin reflects the benefits from cost reduction actions.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the three months ended June 30,
2009 was $169.2 million (15.0% of revenue) compared with $251.0 million (18.7%
of revenue) in the year-ago period. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expense reflects the benefits from cost reduction actions as
well as foreign currency exchange fluctuations. Included in selling, general
and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was a
charge of $5.5 million related to a lease guarantee.
17
Research and development (R&D) expenses in the second quarter of 2009 were
$25.1 million compared with $30.2 million in the second quarter of 2008. The
decrease in R&D expenses in 2009 compared with 2008 principally reflects
changes in the company's development model as the company has focused its
investments on software development versus hardware design.
For the second quarter of 2009, the company reported an operating income of
$75.4 million compared with operating income of $22.6 million in the second
quarter of 2008.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 pension income was $8.9 million
compared with pension income of $8.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008. The expense related to the company's match to the U.S. 401(k)
plan for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero and $14.6
million, respectively. Effective January 1, 2009, the company match was
suspended. The company records pension income or expense, as well as other
employee-related costs such as 401(k) match, payroll taxes and medical
insurance costs, in operating income in the following income statement
categories: cost of revenue; selling, general and administrative expenses; and
research and development expenses. The amount allocated to each category is
based on where the salaries of active employees are charged.
Due to changes in estimates related to cost reduction charges, during the three
months ended June 30, 2009, $7.0 million was recorded as income compared with
$2.5 million recorded as expense in the year-ago period. In addition, during
the three months ended June 30, 2009, the company recorded a benefit of $11.2
million (a $5.4 million benefit in other income, a $6.1 million benefit in cost
of revenue and an expense of $.3 million in selling, general and administrative
expense related to legal fees) relating to a change in Brazilian law involving
a gross receipt tax.
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 was $21.2 million
compared with $21.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Other income (expense), net was income of $3.0 million in the second quarter of
2009, compared with expense of $6.4 million in 2008. The decrease in expense
was principally due to foreign exchange gains of $1.4 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with losses of $2.5 million in the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and the income of $5.4 million in the second quarter
of 2009 related to the Brazilian law change discussed above.
The company reported income before income taxes for the three months ended June
30, 2009 of $57.2 million compared with a loss before income taxes of $5.0
million in 2008. The provision for income taxes was $16.6 million in the
second quarter compared with a provision of $3.5 million in the year-ago
period. Included in the tax provision for the three months ended June 30, 2009
was a U.S. refundable credit of $4.0 million and included in the tax provision
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was a $5.1 million benefit related to
prior years' intercompany royalties. The company evaluates quarterly the
realizability of its deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance
and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The company will
record a tax provision or benefit for those international subsidiaries that do
not have a full valuation allowance against their deferred tax assets. Any
profit or loss recorded for the company's U.S. operations will have no
provision or benefit associated with it. As a result, the company's provision
or benefit for taxes will vary significantly quarter to quarter depending on
the geographic distribution of income.
The net income attributable to Unisys Corporation for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 was $38.1 million, or $.10 per share, compared with a net loss
attributable to Unisys Corporation of $14.0 million, or $.04 per share, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008.
Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $2.23 billion compared with
$2.64 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a decrease of 16% from
the prior year. Foreign currency fluctuations had a 9-percentage-point
negative impact on revenue in the current period compared with the year-ago
period. Services revenue declined 14% and Technology revenue declined 30% for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the year-ago period. U.S.
revenue was down 3% in the first half of 2009 compared with the year-ago
period, principally driven by declines in commercial revenue which were
partially offset by increases in Federal government revenue. International
revenue decreased 25% in the first half of 2009 due to declines in all major
regions. On a constant currency basis, international revenue declined 10% in
the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the six months ended June 30,
2008.
18
Total gross profit margin was 22.1% in the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared with 22.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in
gross profit margin principally reflects the decline in revenue which more than
offset the benefits from cost reduction actions.
Selling, general and administrative expense in the six months ended June 30,
2009 was $342.8 million (15.4% of revenue) compared with $483.5 million (18.3%
of revenue) in the year-ago period. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expense reflects the benefits from cost reduction actions as
well as foreign currency exchange fluctuations.
Research and development (R&D) expenses in the first half of 2009 were $52.5
million compared with $62.9 million in the first half of 2008. The decrease in
R&D expenses in 2009 compared with 2008 principally reflects changes in the
company's development model as the company has focused its investments on
software development versus hardware design.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the company reported operating income
of $97.4 million compared with operating income of $50.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 pension income was $11.8 million
compared with pension income of $20.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2008. The decrease in pension income in 2009 from 2008 was principally due to
lower returns on plan assets worldwide. The expense related to the company's
match to the U.S. 401(k) plan for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
was zero and $26.7 million, respectively.
Due to changes in estimates related to cost reduction charges, during the six
months ended June 30, 2009, $9.4 million was recorded as income compared with
$.8 million recorded as income in the year-ago period. In addition, during the
six months ended June 30, 2009, the company recorded a benefit of $11.2 million
(a $5.4 million benefit in other income, a $6.1 million benefit in cost of
revenue and an expense of $.3 million in selling, general and administrative
expense related to legal fees) relating to a change in Brazilian law involving a
gross receipt tax.
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $43.0 million
compared with $42.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Other income (expense), net was an expense of $3.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, compared with expense of $7.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in expense was principally due to foreign
exchange losses of $5.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
with foreign exchange losses of $2.8 million in the six months ended June 30,
2008 and the income of $5.4 million in the first half of 2009 related to the
Brazilian law change discussed above.
The company reported income before income taxes for the six months ended June
30, 2009 of $50.7 million compared with income of $.3 million in 2008. The
provision for income taxes was $32.2 million in the first half of 2009 compared
with a provision of $27.4 million in the year-ago period. Included in the tax
provision for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was a U.S. refundable credit
of $6.0 million and a foreign tax refund of $2.7 million related to a 2008
refund claim. Included in the tax provision for the six months ended June 30,
2008 was a $5.1 million benefit related to prior years' intercompany royalties.
The net income attributable to Unisys Corporation for the six months ended June
30, 2009 was $13.7 million, or $.04 per share, compared with a net loss
attributable to Unisys Corporation of $37.4 million, or $.10 per share, for the
six months ended June 30, 2008.
SEGMENT RESULTS
The company has two business segments: Services and Technology. Revenue
classifications by segment are as follows: Services - systems integration and
consulting, outsourcing, infrastructure services and core maintenance;
Technology - enterprise-class servers and specialized technologies. The
accounting policies of each business segment are the same as those followed by
the company as a whole. Intersegment sales and transfers are priced as if the
sales or transfers were to third parties. Accordingly, the Technology segment
recognizes intersegment revenue and manufacturing profit on hardware and
software shipments to customers under Services contracts. The Services
segment, in turn, recognizes customer revenue and marketing profit on such
shipments of company hardware and software to customers. The Services segment
also includes the sale of hardware and software products sourced from third
parties that are sold to customers through the company's Services channels. In
the company's consolidated statements of income, the manufacturing costs of
products sourced from the Technology segment and sold to Services customers are
reported in cost of revenue for Services.
19
Also included in the Technology segment's sales and operating profit are sales
of hardware and software sold to the Services segment for internal use in
Services engagements. The amount of such profit included in operating income
of the Technology segment for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$9.1 million and $5.7 million, respectively. The amount for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $10.6 million and $11.2 million, respectively.
The profit on these transactions is eliminated in Corporate.
The company evaluates business segment performance on operating profit
exclusive of cost reduction charges and unusual and nonrecurring items, which
are included in Corporate. All other corporate and centrally incurred costs
are allocated to the business segments, based principally on revenue,
employees, square footage or usage.
Information by business segment is presented below (in millions of dollars):
Elimi-
Total nations Services Technology
------- ------- -------- ----------
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
- ------------------
Customer revenue $1,128.7 $1,030.0 $ 98.7
Intersegment - $ (47.3) 1.6 45.7
-------- ------- ------- ------
Total revenue $1,128.7 $ (47.3) $1,031.6 $ 144.4
======== ======== ======== =======
Gross profit percent 23.9% 21.0% 40.4%
======== ======= ======
Operating income
(loss) percent 6.7% 7.9% (5.4)%
======== ======= ======
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
- ------------------
Customer revenue $1,340.0 $1,197.0 $ 143.0
Intersegment - $ (51.0) 2.7 48.3
-------- ------- ------- ------
Total revenue $1,340.0 $ (51.0) $1,199.7 $ 191.3
======== ======== ======= ======
Gross profit percent 22.7% 19.2% 39.2%
======== ======= ======
Operating income
(loss) percent 1.7% 3.3% (3.7)%
======== ======= ======
Gross profit percent and operating income (loss) percent are as a percent of
total revenue.
20
Customer revenue by classes of similar products or services, by segment, is
presented below (in millions of dollars):
Three Months
Ended June 30
------------------ Percent
2009 2008 Change
---- ---- --------
Services
Systems integration
and consulting $ 351.7 $ 389.4 (9.7)%
Outsourcing 457.9 520.2 (12.0)%
Infrastructure services 143.8 191.9 (25.1)%
Core maintenance 76.6 95.5 (19.8)%
-------- --------
1,030.0 1,197.0 (14.0)%
Technology
Enterprise-class servers 77.1 114.6 (32.7)%
Specialized technologies 21.6 28.4 (23.9)%
-------- --------
98.7 143.0 (31.0)%
-------- --------
Total $1,128.7 $1,340.0 (15.8)%
======== ========
In the Services segment, customer revenue was $1,030.0 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 down 14.0% from the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Services revenue in the second quarter of 2009 when compared with the year-ago
period was impacted by continued world wide weak demand and foreign currency
exchange rates. Foreign currency translation had an 8-percentage-point
negative impact on Services revenue in the current quarter compared with the
year-ago period.
Revenue from systems integration and consulting decreased 9.7% from $389.4
million in the June 2008 quarter to $351.7 million in the June 2009 quarter.
Outsourcing revenue decreased 12.0% for the three months June 30, 2009, as both
information technology outsourcing (ITO) and business processing outsourcing
(BPO) declined.
Infrastructure services revenue declined 25.1% for the three months ended June
30, 2009. The decline was due to weakness in demand for network design and
consulting projects, as well as the shift of project-based infrastructure work
to managed outsourcing contracts.
Core maintenance revenue declined 19.8% in the second quarter compared with the
prior-year quarter. The company expects the secular decline of core
maintenance to continue.
Services gross profit was 21.0% in the second quarter of 2009 compared with
19.2% in the year-ago period. Services operating income percent was 7.9% in
the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with 3.3% in the three months
ended June 30, 2008. Contributing to the increase in Services operating profit
margin was benefits from cost reduction actions.
In the Technology segment, customer revenue was $98.7 million in the June 2009
quarter compared with $143.0 million in the year-ago period for a decrease of
31.0%. Foreign currency translation had a negative impact of approximately 5-
percentage points on Technology revenue in the June 2009 quarter compared with
the prior-year period. The decline in Technology revenue in 2009 reflects
lower sales of high-end mainframe systems, primarily in Europe and Japan, as
clients deferred planned purchases in a weak economic environment.
Revenue from the company's enterprise-class servers, which includes the
company's ClearPath and ES7000 product families, decreased 32.7% for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2008.
As mentioned above, technology sales during the quarter slowed as clients
tightened spending on information technology projects due to economic concerns.
Also contributing to the decrease in revenue was the secular decline in the
enterprise-class server market, which the company expects to continue.
Revenue from specialized technologies, which includes third-party technology
products and the company's payment systems products, decreased 23.9% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the prior year period.
Technology gross profit was 40.4% in the current quarter compared with 39.2% in
the year-ago quarter. Technology operating income (loss) percent was (5.4)% in
the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with (3.7)% in the three months
ended June 30, 2008. The decline in operating profit margin in 2009 compared
with 2008 reflects the lower levels of mainframe sales.
21
Information by business segment is presented below (in millions of dollars):
Elimi-
Total nations Services Technology
------- ------- -------- ----------
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
- ------------------
Customer revenue $2,228.6 $2,013.8 $ 214.8
Intersegment - $ (85.2) 3.3 81.9
-------- ------- ------- ------
Total revenue $2,228.6 $ (85.2) $2,017.1 $ 296.7
======== ======== ======== =======
Gross profit percent 22.1% 18.7% 36.7%
======== ======= ======
Operating income
(loss) percent 4.4% 5.4% (8.6)%
======== ======= ======
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
- ------------------
Customer revenue $2,641.3 $2,334.1 $ 307.2
Intersegment - $ (94.7) 5.4 89.3
-------- ------- ------- ------
Total revenue $2,641.3 $ (94.7) $2,339.5 $ 396.5
======== ======== ======== ======
Gross profit percent 22.6% 18.8% 41.1%
======== ======= ======
Operating income
(loss) percent 1.9% 2.8% (1.4)%
======== ======= ======
Gross profit percent and operating income (loss) percent are as a percent of
total revenue.
Customer revenue by classes of similar products or services, by segment, is
presented below (in millions of dollars):
Six Months
Ended June 30
------------------ Percent
2009 2008 Change
---- ---- --------
Services
Systems integration
and consulting $ 691.2 $ 733.5 (5.8)%
Outsourcing 883.3 1,014.7 (12.9)%
Infrastructure services 286.0 393.6 (27.3)%
Core maintenance 153.3 192.3 (20.3)%
-------- --------
2,013.8 2,334.1 (13.7)%
Technology
Enterprise-class servers 156.7 243.4 (35.6)%
Specialized technologies 58.1 63.8 (8.9)%
-------- --------
214.8 307.2 (30.1)%
-------- --------
Total $2,228.6 $2,641.3 (15.6)%
======== ========
In the Services segment, customer revenue was $2,013.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 down 13.7% from the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Services revenue in the first half of 2009 when compared with the year-ago
period was impacted by continued world wide weak demand and foreign currency
exchange rates. Foreign currency translation had a 10-percentage-point
negative impact on Services revenue in the first half of 2009 compared with the
year-ago period.
Revenue from systems integration and consulting decreased 5.8% from $733.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 to $691.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
22
Outsourcing revenue decreased 12.9% for the six months June 30, 2009, as both
information technology outsourcing (ITO) and business processing outsourcing
(BPO) declined.
Infrastructure services revenue declined 27.3% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The decline was due to weakness in demand for network design
and consulting projects, as well as the shift of project-based infrastructure
work to managed outsourcing contracts.
Core maintenance revenue declined 20.3% in the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared with the prior-year period. The company expects the secular decline
of core maintenance to continue.
Services gross profit was 18.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared
with 18.8% in the year-ago period. Services operating income percent was 5.4%
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with 2.8% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. Contributing to the increase in Services operating profit
margin was benefits from cost reduction actions.
In the Technology segment, customer revenue was $214.8 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with $307.2 million in the year-ago period
for a decrease of 30.1%. Foreign currency translation had a negative impact of
approximately 5-percentage points on Technology revenue in the first half of
2009 compared with the prior-year period. The decline in Technology revenue in
2009 reflects lower sales of high-end mainframe systems, primarily in Europe
and Japan, as clients deferred planned purchases in a weak economic
environment, as well as the expiration of a royalty from Nihon Unisys Limited
(NUL). The company had recognized revenue of $18.8 million per quarter ($8.5
million in enterprise-class servers and $10.3 million in specialized
technologies) under this royalty agreement over the three-year period ended
March 31, 2008. The expiration of this royalty from NUL contributed about 6
percentage points of the technology segment's 30% decline in revenue.
Revenue from the company's enterprise-class servers, which includes the
company's ClearPath and ES7000 product families, decreased 35.6% for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2008.
As mentioned above, technology sales during the period slowed as clients
tightened spending on information technology projects due to economic
concerns. Also contributing to the decrease in revenue was the secular
decline in the enterprise-class server market, which the company expects to
continue.
Revenue from specialized technologies, which includes third-party technology
products and the company's payment systems products, decreased 8.9% for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Technology gross profit was 36.7% in the first half of 2009 compared with 41.1%
in the year-ago period. Technology operating income (loss) percent was (8.6)%
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with (1.4)% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. The declines in gross profit and operating profit margin
in 2009 compared with 2008 reflect the lower levels of mainframe sales,
primarily in Europe and Japan, and loss of the NUL royalty.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See note (j) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a full
description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates
of adoption and estimated effects on results of operations and financial
condition.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2009 were $475.0 million compared with
$544.0 million at December 31, 2008.
The company's principal sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash from
operations and its U.S. trade accounts receivable facility, which is discussed
below. The company's revolving credit facility, which provided for loans and
letters of credit up to an aggregate of $275 million, expired on May 31, 2009.
As discussed below, on July 31, 2009 the company closed private offers to
exchange its outstanding senior notes, for new senior secured notes due in
2014, new senior secured notes due in 2015, common stock and $30 million of
cash. As a result of these exchange offers, $205.1 million of 2010 Notes which
would have been classified as a current liability as of June 30, 2009 has been
reclassified as long-term debt. The company also utilizes surety bonds,
letters of credit, foreign exchange derivatives and other financial instruments
to conduct its business.
23
The company's anticipated future cash expenditures include contributions to its
defined benefit pension plans and payments in respect of cost-reduction actions.
In addition to actions to reduce its cost structure, the company will continue
to focus on working capital management and to tightly manage capital
expenditures. Given these actions and its cash on hand at June 30, 2009, the
company believes that it will have adequate sources of liquidity to meet its
expected near-term cash requirements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, cash provided by operations was
$87.7 million compared with cash provided of $2.3 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008. Cash expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2009
related to cost-reduction actions (which are included in operating activities)
were approximately $46.4 million compared with $43.5 million for the prior-year
period. Cash expenditures for prior year cost-reduction actions are expected
to be approximately $16.8 million for the remainder of 2009, resulting in an
expected cash expenditure of approximately $63.2 million in 2009 compared with
$60.4 million in 2008. The current six month period includes a payment of
$13.4 million related to a tax audit settlement.
Cash used for investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
$173.3 million compared with cash usage of $167.5 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2008. Items affecting cash used for investing activities were
the following: Net proceeds from investments were $1.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared with net purchases of $29.6 million in the
prior-year period. Proceeds from investments and purchases of investments
represent derivative financial instruments used to manage the company's
currency exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. The amount of proceeds and purchases of investments has declined
significantly from last year, principally reflecting the fact that in the
fourth quarter of 2008, the company capitalized certain intercompany balances
for foreign subsidiaries which reduced the need for these derivatives. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the company used $72.3 million of cash to
collateralize letters of credit. In addition, in the current six month period,
the investment in marketable software was $29.5 million compared with $45.4
million in the year-ago period, capital additions of properties were $18.1
million in 2009 compared with $32.1 million in 2008 and capital additions of
outsourcing assets were $53.2 million in 2009 compared with $58.6 million in
2008. The company has announced that it plans to reduce capital expenditures
from $294.5 million in 2008 to approximately $200 - $225 million in 2009.
Cash used for financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2009
was $.7 million compared with $200.8 million of cash used during the six months
ended June 30, 2008. The decrease was principally due to the January 2008
redemption, at par, of all $200 million of the company's 7 7/8% senior notes
due April 1, 2008.
At both June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, total debt was $1.06 billion.
On July 31, 2009, the company completed offers to exchange its 6 7/8% senior
notes due 2010 (the 2010 Notes), its 8% senior notes due 2012 (the 2012 Notes),
its 8 1/2% senior notes due 2015 (the 2015 Notes) and its 12 1/2% senior notes
due 2016 (the 2016 Notes) in private placements for new 12 3/4% senior secured
notes due 2014 (the First Lien Notes), new 14 1/4% senior secured notes due
2015 (the Second Lien Notes and, together with First Lien Notes, the New
Secured Notes), shares of the company's common stock and cash. On that date,
the company issued approximately $385.0 million aggregate principal amount of
First Lien Notes, approximately $246.6 million aggregate principal amount of
Second Lien Notes and approximately 52.4 million shares of common stock and
paid $30.0 million in cash in exchange for approximately $235.1 million
aggregate principal amount of 2010 Notes, approximately $331.9 million
aggregate principal amount of 2012 Notes, approximately $134.0 million
aggregate principal amount of 2015 Notes, and approximately $59.4 million
aggregate principal amount of 2016 Notes. The New Secured Notes are guaranteed
by Unisys Holding Corporation, a wholly-owned Delaware corporation that
directly or indirectly holds the shares of substantially all of the company's
foreign subsidiaries, and by certain of the company's other current and future
U.S. subsidiaries. The First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes are secured by
first-priority liens and second priority liens, respectively, (in each case,
subject to permitted prior liens) by substantially all of the company's assets,
except (i) accounts receivable that are subject to one or more receivables
facilities, (ii) real estate located outside the U.S., (iii) cash or cash
equivalents securing reimbursement obligations under letters of credit or
surety bonds and (iv) certain other excluded assets. As a result of the
exchange, the company's current maturities of long-term debt at June 30, 2009
were reduced to $96.0 million, principally consisting of $64.9 million of
6 7/8% of notes due March 2010 not tendered plus $30.0 million of cash
consideration paid at closing to the holders of the 2010 notes tendered.
Following completion of the exchange, the company's net long-term debt was
reduced by $128.8 million. The company is currently evaluating the accounting
treatment of the exchange offer and will record any gain or loss in the quarter
ending September 30, 2009.
24
The company's revolving credit facility, which provided for loans and letters
of credit up to an aggregate of $275 million expired on May 31, 2009.
On May 16, 2008, the company entered into a three-year, U.S. trade accounts
receivable facility. Under this facility, the company has agreed to sell, on
an ongoing basis, through Unisys Funding Corporation I, a wholly owned
subsidiary, up to $150 million of interests in eligible U.S. trade accounts
receivable. Under the facility, receivables are sold at a discount that
reflects, among other things, a yield based on LIBOR subject to a minimum
rate. The facility includes customary representations and warranties,
including no material adverse change in the company's business, assets,
liabilities, operations or financial condition. It also requires the company
to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and requires the maintenance
of certain ratios related to the sold receivables. The facility will be subject
to early termination if, as of February 28, 2010, the 2010 Notes have not been
refinanced or extended to a date later than May 16, 2011. Other termination
events include failure to perform covenants, materially incorrect
representations and warranties, change of control and default under debt
aggregating at least $25 million. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
company had sold $130 million and $141 million, respectively, of eligible
receivables.
In addition, the company and certain international subsidiaries have access to
uncommitted lines of credit from various banks.
At June 30, 2009, the company has met all covenants and conditions under its
various lending and funding agreements. The company expects to continue to
meet these covenants and conditions.
The company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $100-
$105 million to its worldwide, primarily non-U.S., defined benefit pension
plans in 2009. In accordance with regulations governing contributions to U.S.
defined benefit pension plans, the company is not required to fund its U.S.
qualified defined benefit pension plan in 2009. Previously, the company had
expected to be required to contribute a maximum of approximately $90 million of
cash to its U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan in 2010. Under
recently clarified IRS regulations, the company does not expect to be required
to make a cash contribution in 2010 to fund its U.S. qualified defined benefit
pension plan.
The company may, from time to time, redeem, tender for, or repurchase its
securities in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions depending
upon availability, market conditions and other factors. The company has on
file with the Securities and Exchange Commission an effective registration
statement covering $1.1 billion of debt or equity securities, which enables the
company to be prepared for future market opportunities.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
From time to time, the company provides information containing "forward-looking"
statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events and
include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or
current fact. Words such as "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "intends,"
"plans," "projects" and similar expressions may identify such forward-looking
statements. All forward-looking statements rely on assumptions and are subject
to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the company's actual
results to differ materially from expectations. Factors that could affect
future results include, but are not limited to, those discussed below. Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which that statement is
made. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement
to reflect events or circumstances that occur after the date on which the
statement is made.
Factors that could affect future results include the following:
THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS IS AFFECTED BY THE ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT.
The company's recent financial results have been impacted by the global
economic slowdown. The company has seen this slowdown particularly in its
financial services business but also in other key commercial industries, as
clients reacted to economic uncertainties by reducing information technology
spending. Decreased demand for the company's services and products has
impacted its revenue and profit margins. If current economic conditions
continue or worsen, including if the company's customers are unable to obtain
financing to purchase the company's services and products due to tight credit
conditions, the company could see further reductions in demand and increased
pressure on revenue and profit margins. The company could also see a further
consolidation of firms in the financial services industry, which could also
result in a decrease in demand. In addition, during the recent period of
disruption in the financial markets, the market price for the company's common
shares has been volatile. The company's business could also be affected by
acts of war, terrorism or natural disasters. Current world tensions could
escalate, and this could have unpredictable consequences on the world economy
and on the company's business.
25
THE COMPANY'S FUTURE RESULTS MAY DEPEND ON ITS ABILITY TO ACCESS EXTERNAL
CREDIT MARKETS. The capital and credit markets have been experiencing extreme
volatility and disruption. In addition, the commercial lending market has
contracted, with limited new loan originations or refinancings taking place.
Based on the current lending environment, the company expects to have
difficulty accessing significant additional capital in the credit markets on
acceptable terms. Given tight credit markets, along with the company's credit
rating, the company did not replace its revolving credit facility that expired
on May 31, 2009. Also, the company's ability to refinance the senior notes
that remain outstanding after the closing of the exchange offers could be
affected by credit market conditions. The turmoil and volatility in financial
markets may also impact the company's ability to utilize surety bonds, letters
of credit, foreign exchange derivatives and other financial instruments the
company uses to conduct its business. Although the company intends to use cash
on hand to address its liquidity needs, its ability to do so assumes that its
operations will continue to generate sufficient cash and that its cash
requirements will not materially exceed current estimates.
THE COMPANY HAS SIGNIFICANT PENSION OBLIGATIONS. The company has unfunded
obligations under its U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans. The
company expects to make cash contributions of approximately $100-$105 million
to its worldwide, primarily non-U.S., defined benefit pension plans in 2009.
In accordance with regulations governing contributions to U.S. defined benefit
pension plans, the company is not required to fund its U.S. qualified defined
benefit pension plan in 2009. In addition, under IRS regulations issued in
March 2009, the company currently believes that it will not be required to fund
its U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan in 2010. A further
deterioration in the value of the company's worldwide defined benefit pension
plan assets could require the company to make larger cash contributions to its
defined benefit pension plans in the future. In addition, the funding of plan
deficits over a shorter period of time than currently anticipated could result
in making cash contributions to these plans on a more accelerated basis.
Either of these events would reduce the cash available for working capital and
other corporate uses and may have an adverse impact on the company's
operations, financial condition and liquidity.
THE COMPANY'S FUTURE RESULTS WILL DEPEND ON THE SUCCESS OF ITS TURNAROUND
PROGRAM. Over the past several years, the company has implemented and is
continuing to implement, significant cost-reduction measures intended to
achieve profitability. The company has incurred significant cost reduction
charges in connection with these efforts. Future results will also depend in
part on the success of the company's program to focus its global resources and
simplify its business structure. This program is based on various assumptions,
including assumptions regarding market segment growth, client demand, and the
proper skill set of and training for sales and marketing management and
personnel, all of which are subject to change. Furthermore, the company's
institutional stockholders may attempt to influence these strategies.
THE COMPANY FACES AGGRESSIVE COMPETITION IN THE INFORMATION SERVICES AND
TECHNOLOGY MARKETPLACE. The information services and technology markets in
which the company operates include a large number of companies vying for
customers and market share both domestically and internationally. The company's
competitors include consulting and other professional services firms, systems
integrators, outsourcing providers, infrastructure services providers, computer
hardware manufacturers and software providers. Some of the company's
competitors may develop competing products and services that offer better price-
performance or that reach the market in advance of the company's offerings.
Some competitors also have or may develop greater financial and other resources
than the company, with enhanced ability to compete for market share, in some
instances through significant economic incentives to secure contracts. Some
also may be better able to compete for skilled professionals. Any of these
factors could lead to reduced demand for the company's products and services
and could have an adverse effect on the company's business. Future results will
depend on the company's ability to mitigate the effects of aggressive
competition on revenues, pricing and margins and on the company's ability to
attract and retain talented people.
26
THE COMPANY FACES VOLATILITY AND RAPID TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE IN ITS INDUSTRY.
The company operates in a highly volatile industry characterized by rapid
technological change, evolving technology standards, short product life cycles
and continually changing customer demand patterns. Future success will depend
in part on the company's ability to anticipate and respond to these market
trends and to design, develop, introduce, deliver or obtain new and innovative
products and services on a timely and cost-effective basis. The company may not
be successful in anticipating or responding to changes in technology, industry
standards or customer preferences, and the market may not demand or accept its
services and product offerings. In addition, products and services developed by
competitors may make the company's offerings less competitive.
THE COMPANY'S FUTURE RESULTS WILL DEPEND ON ITS ABILITY TO RETAIN SIGNIFICANT
CLIENTS. The company has a number of significant long-term contracts with
clients, including governmental entities, and its future success will depend,
in part, on retaining its relationships with these clients. The company could
lose clients for such reasons as contract expiration, conversion to a competing
service provider, disputes with clients or a decision to in-source services,
including for contracts with governmental entities as part of the rebid
process. The company could also lose clients as a result of their merger,
acquisition or business failure. The company may not be able to replace the
revenue and earnings from any such lost client.
THE COMPANY'S FUTURE RESULTS WILL DEPEND IN PART ON ITS ABILITY TO GROW
OUTSOURCING. The company's outsourcing contracts are multiyear engagements
under which the company takes over management of a client's technology
operations, business processes or networks. In a number of these arrangements,
the company hires certain of its clients' employees and may become responsible
for the related employee obligations, such as pension and severance commitments.
In addition, system development activity on outsourcing contracts may require
the company to make significant upfront investments. The company will need to
have available sufficient financial resources in order to take on these
obligations and make these investments.
Recoverability of outsourcing assets is dependent on various factors, including
the timely completion and ultimate cost of the outsourcing solution, and
realization of expected profitability of existing outsourcing contracts. These
risks could result in an impairment of a portion of the associated assets,
which are tested for recoverability quarterly.
As long-term relationships, outsourcing contracts provide a base of recurring
revenue. However, outsourcing contracts are highly complex and can involve the
design, development, implementation and operation of new solutions and the
transitioning of clients from their existing business processes to the new
environment. In the early phases of these contracts, gross margins may be
lower than in later years when an integrated solution has been implemented, the
duplicate costs of transitioning from the old to the new system have been
eliminated and the work force and facilities have been rationalized for
efficient operations. Future results will depend on the company's ability to
effectively and timely complete these implementations, transitions and
rationalizations.
FUTURE RESULTS WILL ALSO DEPEND IN PART ON THE COMPANY'S ABILITY TO DRIVE
PROFITABLE GROWTH IN CONSULTING AND SYSTEMS INTEGRATION. The company's ability
to grow profitably in this business will depend on the level of demand for
systems integration projects and the portfolio of solutions the company offers
for specific industries. It will also depend on an improvement in the
utilization of services delivery personnel and on the company's ability to work
through disruptions in this business related to the turnaround program. In
addition, profit margins in this business are largely a function of the rates
the company is able to charge for services and the chargeability of its
professionals. If the company is unable to attain sufficient rates and
chargeability for its professionals, profit margins will suffer. The rates the
company is able to charge for services are affected by a number of factors,
including clients' perception of the company's ability to add value through its
services; introduction of new services or products by the company or its
competitors; pricing policies of competitors; and general economic conditions.
Chargeability is also affected by a number of factors, including the company's
ability to transition employees from completed projects to new engagements, and
its ability to forecast demand for services and thereby maintain an appropriate
headcount.
27
FUTURE RESULTS WILL ALSO DEPEND, IN PART, ON MARKET DEMAND FOR THE COMPANY'S
HIGH-END ENTERPRISE SERVERS AND MAINTENANCE ON THESE SERVERS. In the company's
technology business, high-end enterprise servers and maintenance on these
servers continue to experience secular revenue declines. The company continues
to apply its resources to develop value-added software capabilities and
optimized solutions for these server platforms which provide competitive
differentiation. Future results will depend, in part, on customer acceptance
of ClearPath systems and the company's ability to maintain its installed base
for ClearPath and to develop next-generation ClearPath products that are
purchased by the installed base. Future results of the technology business
will also depend, in part, on the successful execution of the company's
arrangements with NEC.
THE COMPANY'S CONTRACTS WITH U.S. GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES MAY BE SUBJECT TO
AUDITS, CRIMINAL PENALTIES, SANCTIONS AND OTHER EXPENSES AND FINES. The
company frequently enters into contracts with governmental entities. U.S.
government agencies, including the Defense Contract Audit Agency and the
Department of Labor, routinely audit government contractors. These agencies
review a contractor's performance under its contracts, cost structure and
compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. The U.S. government
also may review the adequacy of, and a contractor's compliance with contract
terms and conditions, its systems and policies, including the contractor's
purchasing, property, estimating, billing, accounting, compensation and
management information systems. Any costs found to be overcharged or improperly
allocated to a specific contract or any amounts improperly billed for products
or services will be subject to reimbursement to the government. If an audit
uncovers improper or illegal activities, the company may be subject to civil
and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions, including termination of
contracts, forfeiture of profits, suspension of payments, fines and suspension
or prohibition from doing business with the U.S. government.
THE COMPANY'S CONTRACTS MAY NOT BE AS PROFITABLE AS EXPECTED OR PROVIDE THE
EXPECTED LEVEL OF REVENUES. A number of the company's long-term contracts for
infrastructure services, outsourcing, help desk and similar services do not
provide for minimum transaction volumes. As a result, revenue levels are not
guaranteed. In addition, some of these contracts may permit customer
termination or may impose other penalties if the company does not meet the
performance levels specified in the contracts.
The company's contracts with governmental entities are subject to the
availability of appropriated funds. These contracts also contain provisions
allowing the governmental entity to terminate the contract at the governmental
entity's discretion before the end of the contract's term. In addition, if the
company's performance is unacceptable to the customer under a government
contract, the government retains the right to pursue remedies under the
affected contract, which remedies could include termination.
Certain of the company's outsourcing agreements require that the company's
prices be benchmarked and provide for a downward adjustment to those prices if
the pricing for similar services in the market has changed. As a result,
anticipated revenues from these contracts may decline.
Some of the company's systems integration contracts are fixed-price contracts
under which the company assumes the risk for delivery of the contracted
services and products at an agreed-upon fixed price. At times the company has
experienced problems in performing some of these fixed-price contracts on a
profitable basis and has provided periodically for adjustments to the estimated
cost to complete them. Future results will depend on the company's ability to
perform these services contracts profitably.
THE COMPANY MAY FACE DAMAGE TO ITS REPUTATION OR LEGAL LIABILITY IF ITS CLIENTS
ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH ITS SERVICES OR PRODUCTS. The success of the company's
business is dependent on strong, long-term client relationships and on its
reputation for responsiveness and quality. As a result, if a client is not
satisfied with the company's services or products, its reputation could be
damaged and its business adversely affected. Allegations by private litigants
or regulators of improper conduct, as well as negative publicity and press
speculation about the company, whatever the outcome and whether or not valid,
may harm its reputation. In addition to harm to reputation, if the company
fails to meet its contractual obligations, it could be subject to legal
liability, which could adversely affect its business, operating results and
financial condition.
28
FUTURE RESULTS WILL DEPEND IN PART ON THE PERFORMANCE AND CAPABILITIES OF THIRD
PARTIES. The company has commercial relationships with suppliers, channel
partners and other parties that have complementary products, services or
skills. Future results will depend, in part, on the performance and
capabilities of these third parties, on the ability of external suppliers to
deliver components at reasonable prices and in a timely manner, and on the
financial condition of, and the company's relationship with, distributors and
other indirect channel partners.
THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO THE RISKS OF DOING BUSINESS INTERNATIONALLY. More
than half of the company's total revenue is derived from international
operations. The risks of doing business internationally include foreign
currency exchange rate fluctuations, changes in political or economic
conditions, trade protection measures, import or export licensing requirements,
multiple and possibly overlapping and conflicting tax laws, new tax
legislation, weaker intellectual property protections in some jurisdictions and
additional legal and regulatory compliance requirements applicable to
businesses that operate internationally, including the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act and non-U.S. laws and regulations.
THE COMPANY COULD FACE BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL RISK IN IMPLEMENTING FUTURE
DISPOSITIONS OR ACQUISITIONS. As part of the company's business strategy, it
may from time to time consider disposing of existing technologies, products and
businesses that may no longer be in alignment with its strategic direction,
including transactions of a material size or acquiring complementary
technologies, products and businesses. Potential risks with respect to
dispositions include difficulty finding buyers or alternative exit strategies
on acceptable terms in a timely manner; potential loss of employees; and
dispositions at unfavorable prices or on unfavorable terms, including relating
to retained liabilities. Any acquisitions may result in the incurrence of
substantial additional indebtedness or contingent liabilities. Acquisitions
could also result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities and an
increase in amortization expenses related to intangible assets. Additional
potential risks associated with acquisitions include integration difficulties;
difficulties in maintaining or enhancing the profitability of any acquired
business; risks of entering markets in which the company has no or limited
prior experience; potential loss of employees or failure to maintain or renew
any contracts of any acquired business; and expenses of any undiscovered or
potential liabilities of the acquired product or business, including relating
to employee benefits contribution obligations or environmental requirements.
Further, with respect to both dispositions and acquisitions, management's
attention could be diverted from other business concerns. Current adverse
credit conditions could also affect the company's ability to consummate
divestments or acquisitions. The risks associated with dispositions and
acquisitions could have a material adverse effect upon the company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. There can be no assurance that
the company will be successful in consummating future dispositions or
acquisitions on favorable terms or at all.
THE COMPANY'S SERVICES OR PRODUCTS MAY INFRINGE UPON THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
RIGHTS OF OTHERS. The company cannot be sure that its services and products do
not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties, and it may
have infringement claims asserted against it or against its clients. These
claims could cost the company money, prevent it from offering some services or
products, or damage its reputation.
PENDING LITIGATION COULD AFFECT THE COMPANY'S RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR CASH
FLOW. There are various lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings that
have been brought or asserted against the company, which arise in the ordinary
course of business, including actions with respect to commercial and government
contracts, labor and employment, employee benefits, environmental matters and
intellectual property. See note (k) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for more information on litigation. The company believes that it has
valid defenses with respect to legal matters pending against it. Litigation is
inherently unpredictable, however, and it is possible that the company's
results of operations or cash flow could be affected in any particular period
by the resolution of one or more of the legal matters pending against it.
29
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
There has been no material change in the company's assessment of its
sensitivity to market risk since its disclosure in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
- --------------------------------
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009. Based
on this evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were
effective for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information the Company
is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms.
Such evaluation did not identify any change in the Company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2009
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Part II - OTHER INFORMATION
- ------- -----------------
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
- ------- -----------------
Information with respect to litigation is set forth in note (k) of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial statements, and such information is incorporated herein
by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
- ------- ------------
See "Factors that may affect future results" in Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for a discussion of
risk factors.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
- ------- ---------------------------------------------------
(a) The company's 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) was
held on May 28, 2009.
(b) The following matters were voted upon at the Annual Meeting and received
the following votes:
(1) Election of Directors as follows:
J. Edward Coleman - 329,080,856 votes for; 9,124,285 votes withheld
Leslie F. Kenne - 325,081,867 votes for; 13,123,274 votes withheld
(2) Ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as the company's independent
registered public accounting firm for 2009 - 331,316,265 votes for; 4,976,954
votes against; 1,911,922 abstentions.
(3) Approval of an amendment to the company's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to (a) effect a reverse stock split of the company's common stock
at a reverse split ratio of between 1-for-5 and 1-for-20, which ratio will be
selected by the company's Board of Directors, and (b) decrease the number of
authorized shares of common stock on a basis proportional to the reverse stock
split approved by the Board of Directors - 300,929,407 votes for; 35,106,252
votes against; 2,169,482 abstentions.
Item 6. Exhibits
- ------- --------
(a) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index
30
SIGNATURES
----------
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
UNISYS CORPORATION
Date: July 31, 2009 By: /s/ Janet Brutschea Haugen
-----------------------------
Janet Brutschea Haugen
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
By: /s/ Scott Hurley
----------------------
Scott Hurley
Vice President and
Corporate Controller
(Chief Accounting Officer)
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number Description
- ------- -----------
3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Unisys Corporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999)
3.2 Bylaws of Unisys Corporation, as amended through December 6, 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the registrant's Current
Report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2007)
12 Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1 Certification of J. Edward Coleman required by Rule 13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a)
31.2 Certification of Janet Brutschea Haugen required by Rule 13a-14(a)
or Rule 15d-14(a)
32.1 Certification of J. Edward Coleman required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
32.2 Certification of Janet Brutschea Haugen required by Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Exhibit 12
UNISYS CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)
($ in millions)
Six
Months
Ended Years Ended December 31
June 30, ----------------------------------
2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
-------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Fixed charges
Interest expense $ 43.0 $ 85.1 $ 76.3 $ 77.2 $ 64.7 $ 69.0
Interest capitalized during
the period 3.4 9.0 9.1 9.9 15.0 16.3
Amortization of debt issuance
expenses 1.9 4.1 3.8 3.8 3.4 3.5
Portion of rental expense
representative of interest 25.3 50.6 55.9 56.7 60.9 61.6
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Total Fixed Charges 73.6 148.8 145.1 147.6 144.0 150.4
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Earnings
Income (loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes(1) 50.7 (64.5) 29.4 (242.2)(203.1) (85.5)
Add (deduct) the following:
Share of loss (income) of
associated companies - - - 4.5 (7.2) (14.0)
Amortization of capitalized
interest 6.9 16.1 14.5 13.7 12.9 11.7
----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Subtotal 57.6 (48.4) 43.9 (224.0)(197.4) (87.8)
----- ------ ------ ------ ------ -----
Fixed charges per above 73.6 148.8 145.1 147.6 144.0 150.4
Less interest capitalized during
the period (3.4) (9.0) (9.1) (9.9) (15.0) (16.3)
----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total earnings (loss) $127.8 $ 91.4 $179.9 $(86.3)$(68.4)$ 46.3
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges 1.74 * 1.24 * * *
===== ====== ====== ====== ====== =====
(1) Amounts for the years 2004-2008 have been reclassified to reflect the
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
"Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements."
* Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were
inadequate to cover fixed charges by $57.4 million, $233.9 million, $212.4
million and $104.1 million, respectively.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, J. Edward Coleman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unisys Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.
Date: July 31, 2009
/s/ J. Edward Coleman
-------------------------
Name: J. Edward Coleman
Title: Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Janet Brutschea Haugen, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Unisys Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.
Date: July 31, 2009
/s/ Janet Brutschea Haugen
-------------------------
Name: Janet Brutschea Haugen
Title: Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, J. Edward Coleman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Unisys Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: July 31, 2009
/s/ J. Edward Coleman
- ------------------------
J. Edward Coleman
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
I, Janet Brutschea Haugen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Unisys Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: July 31, 2009
/s/ Janet Brutschea Haugen
- ------------------------
Janet Brutschea Haugen
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.